Opinion Piece: Educator Preparation and Development

This week in my coursework I was asked to compose an opinion piece over one of the four areas of the Texas Long-Range Plan for Technology, 2006-2020. The four areas include Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development; Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support; and Infrastructure for Technology. I chose to write about Educator Preparation and Development for two reasons. The first being that my campus in the Texas Campus STaR Chart was low in this area and the second reason being that I believe this is one of the more important areas of the Long-Range Plan.
This section is very important to our goal of creating 21st Century Learners. Today, teachers must be able to prepare students for their future in by assuring that all students will thrive in the world after they finish their public education. As teachers we need to have the skills needed to change instruction to meet the needs of this upcoming generation of Texas Students. Through this area of the Long-Range Plan we are focusing on Professional Learning which is an ongoing process that will provide current educators with the knowledge and skills and classroom strategies needed to transform teaching and learning. Educators and school districts alike, must take the initiative to increase personal learning through ongoing professional development or continuing education.
In Texas we have already make progress in this area. Teachers are now required to meet Technology Applications educator standards. Not to mention, educator preparation programs are providing coursework that addresses these standards and their relationship with core subject areas. Veteran teachers are also getting their fair share of professional development regarding the SBEC Technology Applications Standards through ongoing job-embedded professional development. To ensure that educators can support the move from traditional schooling to 21st Century learning Texas must prepare teaches for significantly diverse roles, students and technologies. Currently, professional learning should include new ways to teach that lead to improvements in student academic achievement. Trends in the classroom today include teachers using instructional strategies that reflect current research, modern contexts which engage students in learning, and classroom assessments the measure more effectively what students are learning.
To further improve this area and further my campuses gains in this area I believe we should continue to provide job-embedded professional development. As a classroom teacher this is the best way that I learned and implemented technology in my classroom. We as a state and a campus to need make sure that we teach our educators in the same manner as we teach our students, they need to know how to apply the skills, not just be able to perform one of two select maneuvers. I also believe providing staff who are on-site ready to assist teachers as they move through the scale of knowledge of technology would establish a comfort zone where the teachers would be more likely to take a risk within technology, thus establishing a culture or norm of how teachers at my campus integrate technology into their instructional settings.
In conclusion, I believe that Texas has taken the precautionary steps to maintain the high standard or success and achievement that our students are so accustomed to. By improving my campus' achievement in this area, I hope to align my school directly with the goals and plans Texas has for Public Education through the year 2020.

Texas Campus STaR Chart Summary

This powerpoint summarizes Cameron Elementary's Campus STaR Chart beginning with the year 2006 through 2009. This was created by Wendy L. Mahan for Instructional Leadership EA1162 Week #2 Assignment. Check out this SlideShare Presentation:

Summary of Pre-K Technology Applications

The Pre-K Technology Guidelines outline five domains of Applications for Pre-K. The five domains consist of Social and Emotional Development, Language and Communication, Emergent Writing, emergent Reading and Emergent Math.
The first domain Social and Emotional Development concerns the children's social and emotional development, as it is important for school readiness. These skills give children a sense of who they are and what they can do. This domain encompasses strategies such as establishing positive relationships with teachers and other children, participating in the class community, respecting others and becoming an active contributor to the community. This domain encompasses four skills: Self-Concept, Self-Control, Social competence, and Social Awareness.
The second domain of the Pre-K standards is the Language and Communication. This domain is occurs when teachers support children's language and communication development by integrating activities into daily routines, playful, and purposeful activities to encourage their use of language. This domain encompasses five strands, Listening Comprehension, Speaking Skills, Speech Production, Vocabulary Skills, and Sentence and Sentence Structure Skills.
The third domain is Emergent Literacy Writing. This domain focuses on young children beginning to learn about the forms, features and functions of writing as they watch adults write and participate in their own early writing activities like drawing and scribbling. Children's motivation to write increases when they learn their writing conveys meanings. This domain consist of four strands, Motivation to Write, Independently Conveys Meaning, Forms Letter Skills, and concepts about Print Skills.
The fourth domain emergent Literacy Reading illustrates that pre-kindergarten literacy experiences provide the foundation for learning to read. As children watch adults engage in reading and writing activities, they are motivated to learn to read and write. This domain encompasses four strands much like the Writing. Motivation to Read, Phonological awareness, Alphabet Knowledge, and Comprehension of Text Read Aloud.
The fifth and final domain of the Pre-K TEKS is Mathematics. Because children have a natural tendency toward Math, teachers can extend and support this interest by integrating math activities into daily routines and by planning brief, focused math activities in small groups. This domain is divided into five strands: Counting Skills, Adding To/Taking Away, Geometry and Spatial Sense, Measurement Skills, and Classification and Pattern Skills.
I believe the Pre-K TEKS layout the foundation for student performance in future exponentially well. These TEKS have taken the basic functions and "best practices" of technological 21st Century Students and watered them down sufficiently so that a 4 year old can begin to get a grasp for the things that are required of them in school. Students are totally immersed from the beginning of school in technology and the "ways of technological thinking!" Because the Technology Applications TEKS are a spiraling curriculum Pre-K students are hit from all different directions each year as they progress through public education with what is required of them. It is my hope, that as an educator in conjunction the State of Texas, that 13 years from now when these Pre-K students are out in the real world, we have given them the hard-core definite tools for taking on the world. I think the Pre-K TEKS do a great job of the first step toward success of that goal.

I would like to elaborate another form of spiraling or scaffolding curriculum much like the Technology Applications TEKS which are designed as a dynamic, spiraling curriculum. This summer I had the opportunity to attend a two-day workshop in which I was updated with the new English, Language Arts and Reading (ELAR) TEKS for Kindergarten through English IV. These newly revised and updated TEKS are another great example of scaffolding/spiraling TEKS. The ELAR TEKS begin in Kindergarten and continually begin to build and spiral back upon themselves until English IV. This type of curriculum makes it very easy for teachers to strive to educate her students to think critically and analyze their instruction and learning. We all know that if we expect students to think critically and analyze information that we bring to them, they have to know that information backwards and forwards. I think that the Technology Applications TEKS and the new updated ELAR TEKS do a good job of scaffolding the information so that by the time the students are ready to think critically and analytically, they have the background knowledge to do so effectively. In my opinion, scaffolding and spiraling is the only way to approach curriculum and learning standards.

Texas Long-Range Plan for Technology

This week in my coursework, I was asked to familiarize myself with the Texas Long-Range Plan for Technology. I began by reading extensively through the plan, which contains four main parts: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership, Administration, and Instructional Support, and lastly Infrastructure for Technology. Honestly, prior to reading the plan I was a little confused, not really understanding what each part of the plan was going to encompass. Was it going to give me specific instructions until the year 2020, or was it only going to give me suggestions as to how to guide and integrate it at my campus?

The information I acquired from this plan answered both of the above questions far beyond my expectations. I have to admit after analyzing this plan and comprehending the information I feel one hundred percent more confident and self-assured, no to mention qualified to guide, integrate, and implement technology on my campus.

The plan outlined expectations of technology in all areas, specifically a vision of technology in Texas schools. Although, I consider myself fairly techno0logically advanced, I did have some lingering doubts that I was going to fall short of the technological expectations Texas is making on our classrooms. By reviewing the Expectations of the Plan section, Defining the Need for Change section, Introducing the 21st Learner section, and Teacher Voices section I was able to understand what the whole point of the Long-Range Plan. Because, we are in a technological age and our students are the diversified learners that they are, there is an insurmountable need to integrate technology into our schools. This plan outlines just how to do that. Because, I can remember when I was "in the classroom" and struggling with trying to reach everybody on their diversified levels with the type of instruction that fit their learning style I could identify with many of the conditions upon which the plan was written. As an administrator because it is my responsibility to define the current and future challenges impeding educational and economic progress, and develop a strategic educational response, this where I would pick up the Long-Range Plan. We as educators are in a moment of change, and we all know how hard change is for educators, using the plan to guide a campus through integration and use of technology is essential. I feel confident that I now have recommendations to fall back on regarding Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology.

Responses and Reflections: Technology Applications Inventory & SETDA Building Survey

This week in my Masters class I gained much needed insight and learning regarding Instructional Leadership and Digital-Age Teaching and Learning. I am now familiar with Texas Long-Range Plan for Technology, The Technology Application TEKS, and their four domains. Before I was able to fully understand technology in public education and what it takes to be an administrator (who will provide adequate support and knowledge regarding technology) I had to complete two technology assessments in order to assess my own weaknesses and strengths in this information age.
The first assessment I completed was the Technology Applications Inventory. This is a self-assessment of requisite knowledge required for implementation of the Technology Applications TEKS. By completing this assessment I assessed my knowledge and skills in the four strands: Foundations, Information Acquisition, Solving Problems, and Communication. Before I began the assessment, I believed that I would perform greatly, after all I am only 28...how out of touch could I really be with technology? HA! That was a long shot. I wasn't terrible, but I wasn't what I would consider technological savy either. I fared better in some domains than others. Seems like Foundations and Solving Problems seemed to be the areas where I need the most work. However, after analyzing my responses to the assessment, that I still don't understand how "exactly" the Internet works today....all I know is it works! I attribute this to my personality and social spirit. Figuring out how and why something like the Internet worked, was trivial and boring to me. I knew I wasn't ever going to be a computer technician so therefore, I didn't ever take the time to learn. Acquiring information the second domain, that was a breeze. I acquire information and apply it daily on my campus. I am the Reading Recovery Teacher and recently this year we implemented a new Accelerated Reader program....guess who was in charge of setting the whole thing up and "acquiring all the info?" I feel pretty confident and secure in my knowledge of acquiring information. Domain three seemed to be another area where I was weak and could use improvement. However, this one is more specific than Foundations, in Domain Three Solving Problems I struggle with anything that has to do with Excel and spreadsheets. I have no excuse, I learned this in school and from what I understand it is so easy I could easily re-learn it...which I am going to! Of course in the communication domain, I fared really well. I absolutely love to email and communicate through technology.

The second assessment was The State Educational Technology Directors Association Building Survey. Honestly, this survey was not nearly as informational or comparable to the first. I wasn't able to come away knowing what I needed to improve upon, or what specifically the assessment was measuring like the Technology Applications Assessment. I believe my campus and district is very technological advanced and we strive to put technology first and foremost within our classrooms and learning environments. But, after I completed the assessment I don't feel that my district/campus or any other surrounding districts in Central Texas measure up. My district/campus uses technology in the Math and Science classrooms daily, but not as much in the Reading/ELA classes, which is something we need to work on. We also need to apparently according to the assessment collect data to determine whether technology is impacting student achievement in one or more core content areas. I also believe that my particular campus could benefit from offering more substantial lessons and content for the Computer class which our 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade students attend at least twice a week. This would give us ample ways to improve our scores on this assessment.

After completing these assessments I now know what is in store for me and my students in the future. I have determined personal professional development goals for technology for the future. These goals will help me to increase the knowledge and skills for success in the information age.